International response has put in because a judgment by the leading United Nations court that Israel’s continued existence in the inhabited Palestinian area is illegal and must promptly be brought to an end.
Palestinian authorities have hailed the International Court of Justice judgment as a “watershed minute” in their decades-long battle for justice. Israel rapidly condemned Friday’s choice, while its leading ally the United States criticised the judgment on Saturday after preliminary silence.
While nonbinding, the advisory judgment by the 15 judges discovered that Israel has no right to sovereignty over the inhabited area, has broke worldwide laws versus getting area by force and is obstructing Palestinians’ right to self-determination.
It additional figuredout nations are obligated not to “render help or help in keeping” Israel’s existence in the area.
Here’s how the world has responded:
Australia
The federalgovernment of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated it appreciates the ICJ’s “role in promoting worldwide law and the rules-based order”.
“We desire to see concrete actions taken by Israel to stop the growth of settlements to respond to extremist activity,” the federalgovernment stated in a declaration, including that it was still “carefully thinkingabout the information” of the judgment.
Belgium
Minister of Foreign Affairs Hadja Lahbib stated in a social media post: “Belgium will constantly stand up for the regard of worldwide law.”
The International Court of Justice has ruled that Israel’s profession of the Palestinian area does not comply with global law and that settlement activity should stop.
Belgium will constantly stand up for the regard of worldwide law.
— Hadja Lahbib (@hadjalahbib) July 19, 2024
Brazil
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated the judgment “reinforces the requirement for a two-state option, with an independent and feasible state of Palestine living side by side with Israel, in peace and security, within the 1967 borders, which consistof the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, with East Jerusalem as its capital”.
Bolivia
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs called on the UN and its member states to “take suitable steps to stop the criminaloffenses being dedicated in the Gaza Strip and warranty Palestine’s right to self-determination”.
Bolivia cut ties with Israel in the early days of the war and lateron endedupbeing the veryfirst Latin American nation to back a different genocide case brought versus Israel by South Africa at the ICJ.
Egypt
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs called on Israel to end the profession quickly, stop any brand-new settlement activities and leave all existing settlements.
The ministry likewise prompted worldwide celebrations “to regard and carryout the ICJ’s advisory viewpoint, help the Palestinian individuals in workingout their right to self-determination and work to end the humanitarian suffering they withstand”.
Iceland
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated the ICJ judgment is “clear”.
“Continued Israeli profession of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal and so are its settlement activities. Iceland calls on Israel to stop all activity that breaches global law,” it stated.
The ICJ’s Advisory Opinion is clear. Continued Israeli profession of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal, and so are its settlement activities. Iceland calls on Israel to stop all activity that breaches global law.
— MFA Iceland 🇮🇸 (@MFAIceland) July 20, 2024
United States
The administration of President Joe Biden, which typically worries the “rules-based order”, criticised the judgment inspiteof acknowledging that Israeli settlements are “inconsistent” with worldwide law.
“We are worried that the breadth of the court’s viewpoint will makecomplex efforts to willpower the dispute and bring about an urgently required simply and longlasting peace with 2 states living side by side in peace and security,” the US Department of State informed the Reuters news company.
Indonesia
The Southeast Asian nation stated the judgment “addressed the goal of Indonesia and the rest of the global neighborhood in providing justice for the Palestinians”.
“Indonesia calls on the UN General Assembly and the Security Council to satisfy the demand of the court by thinkingabout suitable indicates and essential actions to end Israel’s illegal existence in Palestine,” the Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated.
Ireland
Foreign Minister Michael Martin stated he will work with partners in the EU and UN “to see how we can now bring to bear this reliable viewpoint by the court to end … Israel’s prohibited existence” in the inhabited Palestinian area.
Qatar
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated the ICJ judgment “reflects the high arrangements of global law that should be appreciated”.
It repeated Qatar’s “firm position on the justice of the Palestinian cause and the ethical necessary to assistance the genuine rights of the brotherly Palestinian individuals”.
The State of Qatar Welcomes International Court of Justice’s Advisory Opinion on Israel’s Policies and Practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and East Jerusalem
🔗Read More: https://t.co/FrA6b3Axry#MOFAQatar pic.twitter.com/xS4BnwNHtC
— Ministry of Foreign Affairs – Qatar (@MofaQatar_EN) July 20, 2024
Jordan
Minister of Foreign Affairs Ayman Sadadi stated: “Israel’s impunity should end. Its war criminalactivities should be stopped. Israel needsto be held liable.”
Israel’s response to the ICJ judgment & its Knesset resolution to avoid the satisfaction of Palestinian individuals’s right to flexibility more shows Israel’s total neglect to Int’l law. Israel’s impunity should end. Its war criminalactivities needto be stopped. Israel should be held responsible.
— Ayman Safadi (@AymanHsafadi) July 19, 2024
Kuwait
The Gulf nation’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs called on the worldwide neighborhood to bring out its “legal, political and ethical tasks to accomplish the goals of the brotherly Palestinian individuals to develop their independent state and to stop the hostility versus Gaza“.
Liechtenstein
The European principality’s objective to the UN stated the ICJ “puts the guideline of law at the centre of the settlement of worldwide conflicts”.
“We appearance f