Specialists question Pita snub

Nixing renomination ‘unconstitutional’ Move Forward Party leader Pita Limjaroenrat raises his fist to fellow MFP MPs as he leaves the parliament chamber on Wednesday afternoon after the Constitutional Court had suspended him from MP task pending its judgment on his eligibility to run for political workplace over shareholding in defunct media business iTV Plc. (Photo: Nutthawat Wicheanbut) Legal professionals are questioning whether a parliamentary resolution declining the renomination of Move Forward Party (MFP) leader Pita Limjaroenrat for prime minister was constitutional, recommending the problem oughtto be taken to the Constitutional Court for a judgment. Borwornsak Uwanno, previous chair of a constitution preparing committee, on Thursday knocked the resolution on Facebook, stating the Constitutional Court must appearance into the problem. “Invoking a parliamentary session policy hasactually maimed the constitution regardlessof the reality the charter particularly covers the prime ministerial election,” he composed. “It’s a pity for Thailand.” He stated he was dissatisfied with MPs who voted versus Mr Pita’s renomination. He keptinmind that the parliament’s analysis was not last. Anyone who idea their rights were impacted over this matter might petition the Ombudsman to figureout whether the parliamentary resolution was a breach of Section 213 of the constitution, he stated, obviously referring to Mr Pita. The petition can be sent to the Ombudsman, who will send the petition to the Constitutional Court, Mr Borwornsak stated, including the impacted individual can likewise straight petition the court if the Ombudsman doesn’t. “I will wait and see if parliament’s action breached the constitution,” he stated. “I will see how the Constitutional Court will guideline on this.”
Read More.