The Boston Celtics have a $17.1 million traded player exception (TPE) available to them as their biggest, sexiest teambuilding tool this offseason, able to absorb $17.1 million plus up to $100,000 more in player salary or salaries without having to send anything back.
They will need to make use of it before the TPE — created by signing-and-trading Evan Fournier to the New York Knicks the season prior — before it expires on July 17. There is a good chance it expires, and also that it is used before the league calendar changes to 2022-23 salaries on July 1, 2022, but chances are that Boston will use their Fournier TPE after the 2021-22 season ends on June 30.
With more than a few fans wondering who might be able to be traded into the TPE, we decided to put together a comprehensive guide to every player that would fit as a focal point that would not also fit into one of the Celtics’ smaller TPEs. Let’s take a look at the candidates.
Fit: Above average
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? Yes
Fit: Very good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Slightly unlikely
Negative contract? Slightly
Fit: Near ideal
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Very good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Slightly unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Slightly unlikely
Negative contract? Yes
Fit: Good
Availability: Slightly likely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Very good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Poor
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? Yes
Fit: Very good
Availability: Slightly likely
Negative contract? Neutral to slightly
Fit: Very good
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Very good
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? Slightly
Fit: Very good
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Slightly likely
Negative contract? Slightly
Fit: Very good
Availability: Slightly likely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Near ideal
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Very good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Very good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Slightly likely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Slightly likely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Near ideal
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Very good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Above average
Availability: Slightly likely
Negative contract? Slightly
Fit: Above average
Availability: Slightly likely
Negative contract? Slightly
Fit: Good
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? Slightly
Fit: Good
Availability: Slightly likely
Negative contract? Neutral
Fit: Good
Availability: Slightly unlikely
Negative contract? Neutral
Fit: Very good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Very good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Near ideal
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Near ideal
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Slightly likely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Very good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? Neutral
Fit: Good
Availability: Very likely
Negative contract? Health-dependent
Fit: Good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Excellent
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? Health-dependent
Fit: Good
Availability: Slightly unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Above average
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? Yes
Fit: Very good
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Above average
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? Yes
Fit: Below average
Availability: Very likely
Negative contract? Yes
Fit: Good
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Very good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Very good
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Ideal
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Average
Availability: Very likely
Negative contract? Yes
Fit: Near ideal
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Below average
Availability: Very likely
Negative contract? Yes
Fit: Poor
Availability: Very likely
Negative contract? Yes
Fit: Average
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? Neutral
Fit: Poor
Availability: Very likely
Negative contract? Yes
Fit: Very good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Near ideal
Availability: Very unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Good
Availability: Unlikely
Negative contract? No
Fit: Average
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? Slightly
Fit: Good
Availability: Likely
Negative contract? Neutral
Fit: Good
Availability: Neutral
Negative contract? No
This post originally appeared on Celtics Wire. Follow us on Facebook!