Photo Credit: Tingey Law
The judge in the Diddy ‘gang rape’ claim guidelines that the complainant cannot stay confidential, avoiding the case from moving forward unless the unnamed lady exposes her identity.
A federal judge ruled Thursday (February 29) that the claim submitted versus Sean “Diddy” Combs implicating him of sex trafficking and gang rape cannot relocation forward unless the unnamed complainant exposes her identity.
Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke acknowledged that divulging her identity might “have a considerable effect” on the accuser due to the “graphic and troubling claims in this case,” however identified that the lady had “failed to show” that she might continue anonymously.
“While the court does not take Plaintiff’s issues gently, the Court cannot rely on generalized, uncorroborated declares that disclosure would damage Plaintiff to validate her privacy,” composed Judge Clarke, pointingout previous suits versus Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Spacey in which Jane Doe and John Doe accusers were rejected privacy, mentioning that cases permitted to continue under a pseudonym were “the exception and not the guideline.”