L.A. Reid idea he had legitimate factors to get his sexual attack case tossed out, however a New York judge idea otherwise. The 68-year-old executive’s demand to dismiss the 2023 claim was rejected this week.
Reid’s lawyer mentioned 10 areas of New York’s Penal Law Article 130 that they thought must haveactually gotten eliminated from the suit. They claim that the victim, Drew Dixon, blamed the manufacturer for her profession hasahardtime and utilized the Adult Survivors Act as a method to takeadvantageof the law. “Plaintiff is utilizing those laws to springboard declares of profession aggravation and dissatisfaction,” they composed. “For which there are no prompt or cognisable triggers of action.”
Dixon combated these declares, stating they were “inappropriate” and “a waste of the court’s time.” Judge Valerie Caproni concurred and rejected Reid’s demand. “It is challenging to comprehend any bias triggered by extra citations to other parts of Article 130,” she stated. “Because Defendant has not fulfilled his concern, his Motion to Strike is rejected.”
Drew Dixon’s claim versus LA Reid implicated him of sexual attack on 2 different celebrations. Specifically, he welcomed her to view an apartmentorcondo with him and made multi