Trump begins a new presidential bid facing substantial legal threats from federal prosecutors and in Georgia. The protections for a sitting president aren’t available to candidates, experts said.
- As a 2024 candidate, Trump is a private citizen and isn’t immune from prosecution.
- Trump legal investigations include several by the U.S. Dept. of Justice and a Georgia prosecutor.
- Attorney General Merrick Garland has said that politics won’t factor into DOJ investigations.
WASHINGTON – Donald Trump’s decision to run for president in 2024 has once again thrust to the fore fundamental questions about how prosecutors would handle the panoply of investigations still smoldering from his previous stint in the White House.
Would President Joe Biden’s administration take the historic step of prosecuting a political rival? How might a high-profile criminal or civil case proceeding against Trump during a presidential campaign be viewed by voters? What are the implications for the Department of Justice if prosecutors charged Trump but failed to win a conviction?
What’s clear: In the eyes of the law, Trump will remain a private citizen during his campaign – unable to rely on protections from prosecution he enjoyed as president.
Stay in the conversation on politics: Sign up for the OnPolitics newsletter
Voters: Running for president, fighting in court. Trump’s complicated path.
Midterms: Can Garland pursue Trump probes without influencing the midterms?
“If running for president inoculated you from being indicted by DOJ, the entire Gambino Family would be candidates,” Andrew Weissmann, a former federal prosecutor and a New York University law professor, quipped on Twitter before Trump’s announcement.
Beyond that, experts say an unprecedented decision to indict a former president would be politically perilous for both Trump and Biden. That doesn’t mean it won’t happen.
Will Donald Trump’s legal troubles go away now that he’s running for president in 2024?
The short answer to that question: No.
“The reality of the political situation is unavoidable,” said Kenneth Gross, senior political law counsel at Akin Gump. “However, Mr. Trump is a private person and he’s not above the law and if they have a viable case, the fact that he’s a candidate should not and would not change that.”
For a sitting president, the landscape is less clear. The Department of Justice has opined that a “sitting president is constitutionally immune from indictment and criminal prosecution.” Former special counsel Robert Mueller noted the department’s policy following his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Giuliani: Feds end Rudy Giuliani probe with no lobbying charges
Next phase: Prosecutors in Georgia are investigating election interference
Thomas: Trump lawyers cast Thomas as vital to blocking election, emails show
The Supreme Court in 2020 ruled that presidents could be subjected to criminal subpoenas, but they also have special protections – such as executive privilege – that generally allow them to withhold information and documents from the other branches of government if disclosure would impair executive functions or decisionmaking.
But those protections don’t apply to presidential candidates.
Do prosecutors consider politics when deciding whether to continue investigations or indict candidates?
How much do prosecutors consider the potential political ramifications of a case? Technically speaking, politics don’t a play a role. Attorney General Merrick Garland, a former federal appeals court judge, has repeatedly said he would follow investigations wherever the facts and the law lead. But the answer can be trickier in practice.
Prosecutors have a great deal of discretion in deciding whether to pursue charges.
Sometimes, in an effort to avoid the appearance of politics, the department will appoint a special counsel to oversee an investigation. Justice Department officials have discussed such an appointment, CNN reported earlier this month citing unnamed sources. But the decision whether to prosecute would ultimately rest with Garland.
Kelli Ward: Supreme Court turns away Arizona GOP chair fighting Jan. 6 subpoena
Graham: Supreme Court waves off Graham’s request to block Georgia subpoena
Garland: Attorney general issues prohibitions on political activities for DOJ appointees
“Of course, the department has to assure that a person is not investigated or prosecuted because of politics, and that risk is more serious if the person is a serious candidate,” Weissmann said in an email. “But that concern can be met by the strength of the case and the DOJ precedent of charging similarly situated folks.”
What’s the status of the Trump legal investigations and cases?
The Justice Department has been pursuing at least three avenues of inquiry: What role Trump had in efforts to subvert the 2020 election, the summoning of the mob in the deadly assault on the Capitol in 2021 and the former president’s handling of classified documents that prompted an unprecedented search of his Mar-a-Lago resort.
Federal prosecutors have been most explicit about the possible criminal consequences in the documents investigation, indicating that authorities are weighing possible violations of the Espionage Act and obstruction of justice.
SCOTUS: Supreme Court denies Trump request over Mar-a-Lago classified docs
Record: Donald Trump’s record at the Supreme Court? Not great.
Jan. 6: Supreme Court refuses to block House panel from receiving Trump documents
In New York, meanwhile, Trump faces a civil lawsuit accusing the former president and his adult children of massive fraud in the operation of the family real estate business. That legal action by New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, seeks $250 million in penalties and could impact the Trump Organization’s finances and assets.
A parallel criminal investigation into the family’s financial dealings, while believed to be stalled for some