- In February California State Sen. Scott Wiener revealed a expense called SB 1047 to manage AI business and their work on a state level.
- The expense has currently been passed by the Senate and the state Assembly appropriations committee. It’s now waitingfor a complete assembly vote.
- However, lotsof tech business like OpenAI, Meta, and Anthropic haveactually opposed the expense, fearing it will suppress advancement.
On one hand, Californian policymakers are preparing to vote on a expense this week that would control the development and use of AI in the state. On the other hand, numerous leading tech business such as OpenAI and Meta haveactually been preparing to oppose it.
The expense, understood as SB 1047, was presented by California State Sen. Scott Wiener in February. The primary function of the costs is to set some fundamental security requirements.
Here are some of the points the costs makes:
- Mandatory security screening for advanced AI designs that expense over $100 million to establish or those that need too much computing power.
- A kill switch that can completely shut down the AI system if required.
- AI designers will have to guarantee that their tools aren’t being utilized in cyberattacks.
- Third-party specialists will have to be employed who will evaluate the business’s security practices and supply security to individuals who speak out versus AI abuse.
- The expense will likewise offer the state lawyer basic the power to sue the AI designer if they puton’t adhere to these guidelines.
Current Status of the Bill
The expense has currently been passed by the state Senate by a 32-1 vote. Last week, it was passed by the state Assembly appropriations committee as well.
Now all that’s waiting is a complete Assembly vote. If it passes by the end of the legal session on Aug. 31, the expense will be sentout to Governor Gavin Newsom who will choose whether to indication it or veto it. The final choice will be here by September 30.
Controversy Surrounding the Bill
While Wiener and those who voted in favor of the costs feel it’s essential to have some guidelines in location to securely establish AI, not everybody is in favor of SB 1047.
For beginners, a group of California Congressional Democrats, consistingof Nancy Pelosi, Ro Khanna, and Zoe Lofgren haveactually opposed the costs. In an open letter, Pelosi and others stated that this bill can do more damage than excellent and it may force AI business out of the state.
Tech leaders like OpenAI, Meta, and Anthropic concur with the Congressional Democrats who are versus the costs.
- Jason Kwon, OpenAI’s chief technique officer, composed a letter to Wiener and stated that a costs like this would truly hinder AI advancement in the state and drive out business. He fu